| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dimitri Fontaine" <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Quick Extensions Question |
| Date: | 2011-03-03 22:00:50 |
| Message-ID: | 4D6FBB32020000250003B3D5@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> what if we allow non-superusers to create an extension if all the
> commands in the script are ones they could execute anyway?
+1
The supporting detail all made sense to me. To put it another way,
why would you want to *bar* someone from executing a set of
statements they have authority to execute, just because someone
gathered them together in an extension?
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-03 22:01:07 | Re: Sync Rep v19 |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-03-03 21:49:56 | Re: Quick Extensions Question |