From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature |
Date: | 2011-02-28 10:13:16 |
Message-ID: | 4D6B753C.1010502@cs.helsinki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2011-02-28 8:20 AM +0200, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja<marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
>> On 2011-02-24 6:40 PM, I wrote:
>>> I am planning on working on the documentation this weekend.
>
>> And here's my attempt. The language is a bit poor at some places but I
>> can't think of anything better.
>
> Applied after some rather heavy editorialization.
Thanks again.
>> I tried to be more strict about using "subquery" when talking about
>> WITHs in general since INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE is not a subquery in my book.
>
> I undid most of those changes --- it didn't seem to add anything to be
> strict in this way, and anyway you hadn't done it consistently,
> eg the syntax still had "with_query".
I wasn't so sure about those changes either. It does seem more
consistent this way.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikhil Sontakke | 2011-02-28 12:04:03 | PG signal handler and non-reentrant malloc/free calls |
Previous Message | Yeb Havinga | 2011-02-28 09:31:57 | Re: Sync Rep v17 |