Re: Sync Rep v17

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v17
Date: 2011-02-25 15:41:56
Message-ID: 4D67CDC4.3010203@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2011-02-22 20:43, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>
> you can make this happen more easily, i just run "pgbench -n -c10 -j10
> test" and qot that warning and sometimes a segmentation fault and
> sometimes a failed assertion
>
> and the problematic code starts at
> src/backend/replication/syncrep.c:277, here my suggestions on that
> code.
> still i get a failed assertion because of the second Assert (i think
> we should just remove that one)
>
> *************** SyncRepRemoveFromQueue(void)
> *** 288,299 ****
>
> if (proc->lwWaitLink == NULL)
> elog(WARNING, "could not locate
> ourselves on wait queue");
> ! proc = proc->lwWaitLink;
> }
>
> if (proc->lwWaitLink == NULL) /* At tail */
> {
> ! Assert(proc == MyProc);
> /* Remove ourselves from tail of queue */
> Assert(queue->tail == MyProc);
> queue->tail = proc;
> --- 288,300 ----
>
> if (proc->lwWaitLink == NULL)
> elog(WARNING, "could not locate
> ourselves on wait queue");
> ! else
> ! proc = proc->lwWaitLink;
> }
>
> if (proc->lwWaitLink == NULL) /* At tail */
> {
> ! Assert(proc != MyProc);
> /* Remove ourselves from tail of queue */
> Assert(queue->tail == MyProc);
> queue->tail = proc;
>
I also did some initial testing on this patch and got the queue related
errors with > 1 clients. With the code change from Jaime above I still
got a lot of 'not on queue warnings'.

I tried to understand how the queue was supposed to work - resulting in
the changes below that also incorporates a suggestion from Fujii
upthread, to early exit when myproc was found.

With the changes below all seems to work without warnings. I now see
that the note about the list invariant is too short, better was: "if
queue length = 1 then head = tail"

--- a/src/backend/replication/syncrep.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/syncrep.c
@@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ SyncRepRemoveFromQueue(void)
}
else
{
+ bool found = false;
+
while (proc->lwWaitLink != NULL)
{
/* Are we the next proc in our traversal of the
queue? */
@@ -284,17 +286,19 @@ SyncRepRemoveFromQueue(void)
* No need to touch head or tail.
*/
proc->lwWaitLink = MyProc->lwWaitLink;
+ found = true;
+ break;
}

- if (proc->lwWaitLink == NULL)
- elog(WARNING, "could not locate
ourselves on wait queue");
proc = proc->lwWaitLink;
}
+ if (!found)
+ elog(WARNING, "could not locate ourselves on
wait queue");

- if (proc->lwWaitLink == NULL) /* At tail */
+ /* If MyProc was removed from the tail, maintain list
invariant head==tail */
+ if (proc->lwWaitLink == NULL)
{
- Assert(proc == MyProc);
- /* Remove ourselves from tail of queue */
+ Assert(proc != MyProc); /* impossible since that
is the head=MyProc branch above */
Assert(queue->tail == MyProc);
queue->tail = proc;
proc->lwWaitLink = NULL;

I needed to add this to make the documentation compile

--- a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
@@ -2010,6 +2010,9 @@ SET ENABLE_SEQSCAN TO OFF;
You should also consider setting <varname>hot_standby_feedback</>
as an alternative to using this parameter.
</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+ </variablelist></sect2>

<sect2 id="runtime-config-sync-rep">

regards,
Yeb Havinga

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-25 15:46:57 Re: wCTE: why not finish sub-updates at the end, not the beginning?
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-02-25 15:30:42 Re: wCTE: why not finish sub-updates at the end, not the beginning?