Re: Deadlock situation using foreign keys (reproduceable)

Not a lower strength lock, I would, but I'm not so familiar with the postgres
internals. I modified ri-triggers.c to exclude certain tables from the
locking itself (because I know the tables are not updated).

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Stephan Szabo [mailto:sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com]
Gesendet: Montag, 26. August 2002 17:29
An: Mario Weilguni
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Betreff: Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock situation using foreign keys
(reproduceable)

On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Mario Weilguni wrote:

> I wrote this patch for my system, and it works fine. However, it's a
> really ugly workaround. I can publish the source if anybody is
> interested.

Which, the for update one or a lower strength lock? In either case,
certainly.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly