From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Piotr Gasidło <quaker(at)barbara(dot)eu(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Raid Controller Write Cache setting for WAL and Data |
Date: | 2011-02-17 04:34:04 |
Message-ID: | 4D5CA53C.1010301@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Piotr Gasidło wrote:
> I _can_ afford of loosing some data in case of power failure. But I'm
> afraid of having database in unrecoverable state after crash.
>
Then turn off synchronous_commit. That's exactly the behavior you get
when it's disabled: some data loss after a crash, no risk of database
corruption, and faster performance without needing a controller with a
battery.
If you've already got a RAID controller that accepts a battery, it would
be silly not to then buy one though. The controller is normally 75% of
the price of the combination, so getting that but not the final piece to
really make it perform well wouldn't be a good move.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-02-17 05:59:12 | Re: pl/pgSQL variable substitution |
Previous Message | Jeremy Palmer | 2011-02-17 04:33:49 | pl/pgSQL variable substitution |