| From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Date: | 2011-02-14 12:24:18 |
| Message-ID: | 4D591EF2.6010606@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Cédric,
thanks for taking a step back and bringing in the bigger picture.
On 02/14/2011 11:57 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> one way might be to suggest apt-preferences here, I believe.
Agreed, might be the cleanest way from a technical POV.
> Is debian.postgresql.org to host and distribute the debian packages
> (and the ubuntu's) linked with readline and openSSL something that we
> want and assume ?
Magnus confirmed on IRC, that they'd be willing to host such a repository.
> So far, it looks like. Before pushing more efforts here, I would like
> people who not agree to stand up. Other options exists like a 3rd
> party website, but this is not my favorite solution.
Well, I consider providing packages for more major versions in parallel
a good service anyway. (So this probably deserves its own thread).
But yes, to solve the OPs issue with such a custom repository, we'd need
to be prepared to be responsible for providing a Postgres binary that
links to readline and OpenSSL at the same time. Are we?
Regards
Markus Wanner
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Wanner | 2011-02-14 12:37:35 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Previous Message | Torello Querci | 2011-02-14 12:10:06 | pg_terminate_backend and pg_cancel_backend by not administrator user |