From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement genuine serializable isolation level. |
Date: | 2011-02-08 07:07:46 |
Message-ID: | 4D50EBC2.8010706@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 08.02.2011 05:03, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> Implement genuine serializable isolation level.
>
> With gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664):
>
> predicate.c: In function ‘CheckTargetForConflictsIn’:
> predicate.c:3674: warning: ‘nexttargettag.locktag_field5’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function
> predicate.c:3674: warning: ‘nexttargettag.locktag_field4’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function
> predicate.c:3674: warning: ‘nexttargettag.locktag_field3’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function
> predicate.c:3674: warning: ‘nexttargettag.locktag_field2’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function
> predicate.c:3674: warning: ‘nexttargettag.locktag_field1’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function
Thanks, fixed. I didn't get that warning on gcc 4.4.5, but apparently
older gcc versions are more picky on that.
Also fixed a copy-pasto in my addition of pg_serial in the docs, pointed
out by Kevin off-list.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-02-08 12:24:11 | pgsql: Extend ALTER TABLE to allow Foreign Keys to be added without ini |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-02-08 07:06:21 | pgsql: Fix copy-pasto in description of pg_serial, and silence compiler |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nick Rudnick | 2011-02-08 07:23:15 | Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases) |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2011-02-08 07:05:56 | Re: Named restore points |