Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement genuine serializable isolation level.

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement genuine serializable isolation level.
Date: 2011-02-08 07:07:46
Message-ID: 4D50EBC2.8010706@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 08.02.2011 05:03, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> Implement genuine serializable isolation level.
>
> With gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664):
>
> predicate.c: In function ‘CheckTargetForConflictsIn’:
> predicate.c:3674: warning: ‘nexttargettag.locktag_field5’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function
> predicate.c:3674: warning: ‘nexttargettag.locktag_field4’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function
> predicate.c:3674: warning: ‘nexttargettag.locktag_field3’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function
> predicate.c:3674: warning: ‘nexttargettag.locktag_field2’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function
> predicate.c:3674: warning: ‘nexttargettag.locktag_field1’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function

Thanks, fixed. I didn't get that warning on gcc 4.4.5, but apparently
older gcc versions are more picky on that.

Also fixed a copy-pasto in my addition of pg_serial in the docs, pointed
out by Kevin off-list.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-02-08 12:24:11 pgsql: Extend ALTER TABLE to allow Foreign Keys to be added without ini
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-02-08 07:06:21 pgsql: Fix copy-pasto in description of pg_serial, and silence compiler

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nick Rudnick 2011-02-08 07:23:15 Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases)
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2011-02-08 07:05:56 Re: Named restore points