Re: [PERFORM] pgbench to the MAXINT

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] pgbench to the MAXINT
Date: 2011-02-04 03:28:55
Message-ID: 4D4B7277.80902@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Robert Haas wrote:
> At least in my book, we need to get this committed in the next two
> weeks, or wait for 9.2.
>

Yes, I was just suggesting that I was not going to get started in the
first week or two given the other pgbench related tests I had queued up
already. Those are closing up nicely, and I'll start testing
performance of this change over the weekend.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Mielke 2011-02-04 03:31:35 Does auto-analyze work on dirty writes? (was: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-02-04 03:17:25 Re: exposing COPY API

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Mielke 2011-02-04 03:31:35 Does auto-analyze work on dirty writes? (was: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...)
Previous Message Andy Colson 2011-02-04 03:21:21 Re: getting the most of out multi-core systems for repeated complex SELECT statements