| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,<markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SSI patch version 14 |
| Date: | 2011-02-02 21:42:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4D497B7E020000250003A241@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 02.02.2011 19:36, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> If that part is right, it shouldn't take me very long to finish
>> the specs and capture the expected results.
> Looks good.
First cut on the rest of it pushed. I'll want to go over it again to
confirm, but I think all dcheck testing is now replicated there. I
didn't eliminate dtester/dcheck code yet, in case either of us wanted
to compare, but it can go any time now.
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mladen Gogala | 2011-02-02 21:59:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-02-02 21:25:02 | Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions |