From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Xiaobo Gu <guxiaobo1982(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is there a way to build PostgreSQL client libraries with MinGW |
Date: | 2011-01-27 14:36:31 |
Message-ID: | 4D4182EF.5080709@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 01/27/2011 09:19 AM, Xiaobo Gu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> On 01/27/2011 08:51 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Xiaobo Gu<guxiaobo1982(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> 20:25<jon_y>: please contact psql and ask for a list of accept()
>>>> implementations checked
>>> It looks like we check each argument and the return type for a couple
>>> of possibilities:
>>>
>>> argument 1 can be int or unsigned int
>>> argument 2 can be struct sockaddr * or const struct sockaddr * or void *
>>> argument 3 can be int * or size_t * or socklen_t * or unsigned int * or
>>> void *
>>> the return type can be int or unsigned int PASCAL
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah. it looks like the return type is the likely culprit. It looks like it
>> wants either a signed or unsigned int64. Also, the mingw64 API uses the
>> WSAAPI qualifier instead of PASCAL.
>>
> I am still trying, but I think it may be the first argument, because
> MinGW64 define SOCKET as a pointer, but you accept int or unsigned int
>
No it doesn't. It defines it as an INT_PTR or UINT_PTR which in turn is
an __int64, I think. But you're right, we might need to look at the
first argument as well as the return type.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-27 14:40:04 | Re: BUG #5852: Function date_trunc is not IMMUTABLE |
Previous Message | Xiaobo Gu | 2011-01-27 14:19:14 | Re: Is there a way to build PostgreSQL client libraries with MinGW |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-27 14:46:56 | Re: ALTER TYPE 3: add facility to identify further no-work cases |
Previous Message | Xiaobo Gu | 2011-01-27 14:19:14 | Re: Is there a way to build PostgreSQL client libraries with MinGW |