From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Caution when removing git branches |
Date: | 2011-01-26 16:37:12 |
Message-ID: | 4D404DB8.9020208@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/26/2011 11:26 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
> to remove git branches. For example, I can easily remove a branch on
> my github repository using:
>
> $ git branch -d :branch_name
>
> I don't believe that is revertable. What is scarey is that this could
> be done on our 'origin' as well.
>
The ability to remove branches is a feature. I strongly encourage you to
create topic branches for development work, then merge them onto the
main branch, and then delete them. I almost never work directly on, say,
REL9_0_STABLE or master, except for quite trivial changes.
I thought we had some hooks on gitmaster to help prevent accidents like
inadvertent branch deletion.
I at least still keep rolling backups of the main repo. I'm sure I'm not
alone.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-26 16:42:00 | Re: Caution when removing git branches |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-26 16:33:12 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove arbitrary ALTER TABLE .. ADD COLUMN restriction. |