| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib? |
| Date: | 2011-01-20 18:54:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4D3884E8.6070300@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/20/11 6:15 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> OK, I am ready to move test_fsync to /contrib. Is pg_test_fsync the
>> best name? pg_check_fsync? pg_fsync_performance? pg_verify_fsync?
>
> I don't see too much reason to rename it more than necessary, so how
> about pg_test_fsync?
+1.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-01-20 19:10:13 | Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-01-20 18:47:52 | Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered |