Re: pg_filedump moved to pgfoundry

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_filedump moved to pgfoundry
Date: 2011-01-18 21:43:55
Message-ID: 4D36099B.2080800@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19/01/11 05:51, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why they'd care, but it certainly doesn't seem worth
> spending the amount of time arguing about it that we are. David and
> Mark are, of course, free to spend their time petitioning Red Hat for
> relicensing if they are so inclined, but they aren't entitled to tell
> you how to spend yours. And even if they were, I would hope that
> they'd want you to spend it committing patches rather than arguing
> with your employer about relicensing of a utility that's freely
> available anyway and of use to 0.1% of our user base.
>

Funny how people can read an email and derive a completely different
meaning from what you intended - just to be clear: it certainly wasn't
my intention to tell anyone how to spend their time.

Anyway, good to have pg_filedump on pgfoundry, thanks Tom and RH.

regards

Mark

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-01-18 21:52:43 Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2011-01-18 21:40:40 Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql