| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Warning compiling pg_dump (MinGW, Windows XP) |
| Date: | 2011-01-17 21:37:56 |
| Message-ID: | 4D34B6B4.3040307@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/17/2011 03:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 01/17/2011 07:18 AM, Pavel Golub wrote:
>>> So you think I should just ignore these warnings? Because I can't
>>> remember the same behaviour on 8.x branches...
>> We've had them all along, as I said. See
>> <http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=frogmouth&dt=2011-01-04%2023%3A54%3A16&stg=make>
>> for the same thing in an 8.2 build.
> I wonder why mingw's gcc is complaining about %m when other versions of
> gcc do not? If you can't get it to shut up about that, there's not
> going to be much percentage in silencing warnings about %lld.
>
>
We could add -Wno-format to the flags. That makes it shut up, but maybe
we don't want to use such a sledgehammer.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2011-01-17 22:38:10 | Re: pg_dump directory archive format / parallel pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Dan Ports | 2011-01-17 21:26:06 | Re: SSI patch version 12 |