| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Cottenceau <gc(at)mnc(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The good, old times |
| Date: | 2011-01-14 06:02:28 |
| Message-ID: | 4D2FE6F4.5020201@postnewspapers.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 01/12/2011 10:16 PM, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> What's your point and in what is it related to that ML?
Given the package names, I suspect this is a poorly-expressed complaint
about the performance of downloads from the pgdg/psqlrpms site. If that
was the original poster's intent, they would've been better served with
a post that included some minimal details like:
- Information abut their local connectivity
- mtr --report / traceroute output
- tests from other available hosts
If that wasn't the original poster's intent, perhaps it'd be worth a
second try to explain what they were *trying* to say? Was it just a joke
- 'cos if so, it was kinda flat.
--
Craig Ringer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vitalii Tymchyshyn | 2011-01-14 11:39:04 | Re: queries with lots of UNIONed relations |
| Previous Message | Mladen Gogala | 2011-01-14 03:19:19 | Re: queries with lots of UNIONed relations |