From: | Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | The good, old times |
Date: | 2011-01-12 13:49:01 |
Message-ID: | 4D2DB14D.9070403@vmsinfo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I am running a postgres update on one of my machines:
Downloading Packages:
(1/7): postgresql90-plpython-9.0.2-2PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rp | 50 kB
00:02
(2/7): postgresql90-plperl-9.0.2-2PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rpm | 51 kB
00:03
(3/7): postgresql90-libs-9.0.2-2PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rpm | 217 kB
00:14
(4/7): postgresql90-contrib-9.0.2-2PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rpm | 451 kB
00:40
(5/7): postgresql90-9.0.2-2PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rpm | 1.4 MB
01:57
(6/7): postgresql90-devel-9.0.2-2PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rpm | 1.6 MB
02:48
(7/7): postgresql90-se (68%) 44% [===== ] 7.0 kB/s | 2.2 MB
06:33 ETA
7 kilobytes per second??? That brings back the times of the good, old
9600 USR modems and floppy disks.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Cottenceau | 2011-01-12 14:16:03 | Re: The good, old times |
Previous Message | Florian Weimer | 2011-01-12 13:42:42 | Re: Slow query + why bitmap index scan?? |