From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi> |
Cc: | "Dan Ports" <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, "john(dot)okite(at)gmail(dot)org" <john(dot)okite(at)gmail(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SSI patch version 8 |
Date: | 2011-01-11 14:28:18 |
Message-ID: | 4D2C14A202000025000392BA@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Anssi Kääriäinen<anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi> wrote:
> A speed test showing a significant drop in performance when using
SSI:
>
> hot2=> create table test_t2 as (select generate_series(0, 1000000));
> hot2=> \timing
> begin transaction isolation level repeatable read;
> Time: 0.185 ms
> hot2=> select count(*) from test_t2;
> Time: 134.521 ms
> hot2=> select count(*) from test_t2;
> Time: 142.132 ms
> hot2=> select count(*) from test_t2;
> Time: 147.469 ms
> hot2=> commit;
> hot2=> begin transaction isolation level serializable;
> Time: 0.165 ms
> hot2=> select count(*) from test_t2;
> Time: 349.219 ms
> hot2=> select count(*) from test_t2;
> Time: 354.010 ms
> hot2=> select count(*) from test_t2;
> Time: 355.960 ms
> hot2=> commit;
>
> So, count(*) queries are more than twice as slow compared to the old
> serializable transaction isolation level.
Thanks for the report. I'll profile tat and see what can be done about
it.
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anssi Kääriäinen | 2011-01-11 14:29:21 | Re: SSI patch version 8 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-11 13:56:27 | Re: ALTER TYPE 0: Introduction; test cases |