From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump -X |
Date: | 2010-12-24 14:40:33 |
Message-ID: | 4D145C810200002500038AED@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> The existing comment says that -X is deprecated, but that doesn't
> make it entirely 100% clear that the code isn't intended to be
> further updated
Yeah, Dan recently implemented the DEFERRABLE transaction behavior
which was discussed on the list, so I added a
--serializable-deferrable long option to pg_dump in my repo, and I
had to look at that comment and the the current -X usage for several
minutes before I decided I shouldn't also add a corresponding -X
option -- and even then I wasn't feeling entirely sure about it.
My first recommendation would be to rip it out, but a more explicit
comment would have saved me that time.
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-24 14:45:26 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move the documentation of --no-security-label to a more sensible |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-12-24 14:01:58 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move the documentation of --no-security-label to a more sensible |