From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Subject: | Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite |
Date: | 2010-12-16 13:52:33 |
Message-ID: | 4D0A19A1.2040700@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13.12.2010 20:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> Can we fix it so that each child page is updated, and its downlink
> inserted, as a separate atomic action? That'd require each intermediate
> state to be consistent and crash-safe, but I think you really need the
> intermediate states to be consistent anyway because of concurrent scans.
Here's an updated patch, using that idea.If a page split into more than
two pages, the downlinks for the pages are inserted to the parent
one-by-one, right-to-left, until there's only two remaining. Finally the
downlink for the last remaining right page is inserted and the downlink
for the original page is updated as one atomic operation.
It was a pretty big rewrite again, but seems to work now. I tested
splits that span more than two pages by rigging the btree_gist picksplit
function to choose very bad split points, and the fix-split logic by
adding elog(ERROR) in strategic places to sometimes leave splits incomplete.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
gist-insert-rewrite-5.patch | text/x-diff | 116.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-16 13:55:59 | Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2010-12-16 13:49:45 | Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation |