Re: pgsql: Self review of previous patch. Fix assumption that xmax >= xmin.

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Self review of previous patch. Fix assumption that xmax >= xmin.
Date: 2010-12-13 14:17:15
Message-ID: 4D062AEB.6000906@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On 13.12.2010 16:10, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 13.12.2010 16:01, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 15:23 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> On 13.12.2010 14:56, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 17:02 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Simon Riggs<simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Self review of previous patch. Fix assumption that xmax>= xmin.
>>>>>
>>>>> This seems to require backporting. No?
>>>>
>>>> Already done.
>>>
>>> Nope, that follow-on patch is not in REL9_0_STABLE.
>>
>> Yes, it is.
>>
>> The work was bundled together and the commit messages differ.
>
> No, it's not. See for yourself:
>
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c;h=1c934007b2edbe97e548a7e84fe5802b6b8c5c98;hb=refs/heads/REL9_0_STABLE#l3812

Sorry, I was wrong and you were right. Looks like I need to visit the
optician...

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-12-13 15:09:17 Re: pgsql: Self review of previous patch. Fix assumption that xmax >= xmin.
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-12-13 14:10:47 Re: pgsql: Self review of previous patch. Fix assumption that xmax >= xmin.