| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE; |
| Date: | 2010-12-11 01:02:55 |
| Message-ID: | 4D02CDBF.4080006@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
> I'd much rather expect the extension author to explicitly support each
> pair of (from, to) version numbers that he's prepared to deal with.
> If he can build those update scripts as simple concatenations of
> single-step scripts, great; but let's not hard-wire the assumption that
> that approach MUST work.
That's an n^2 problem.
However, I don't see any obvious way to avoid it.
We would want to support some wildcarding, though, just to avoid having
1,000 version-to-version files in every extension when a lot of the
upgrade actions might be generic. Of course, in order to do
wildcarding, we need to mandate a version numbering system ...
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Loureiro | 2010-12-11 01:06:57 | Re: Anyone for SSDs? |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-12-11 00:46:08 | Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE; |