From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+ |
Date: | 2010-12-09 20:14:25 |
Message-ID: | 4D0138A1.1070603@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/6/10 6:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> OK, patch coming then. Right now test_fsync aborts when O_DIRECT fails.
>> What should I have it do instead?
>
> Report that it fails, and keep testing the other methods.
Patch attached. Includes a fair amount of comment cleanup, since
existing comments did not meet our current project standards. Tests all
6 of the methods we support separately.
Some questions, though:
(1) Why are we doing the open_sync different-size write test? AFAIK,
this doesn't match any behavior which PostgreSQL has.
(2) In this patch, I'm stepping down the number of loops which
fsync_writethrough does by 90%. The reason for that was that on the
platforms where I tested writethrough (desktop machines), doing 10,000
loops took 15-20 *minutes*, which seems hard on the user. Would be easy
to revert if you think it's a bad idea.
Possibly auto-sizing the number of loops based on the first fsync test
might be a good idea, but seems like going a bit too far.
(3) Should the multi-descriptor test be using writethrough on platforms
which support it?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
test_fsync_expanded.patch | text/x-patch | 18.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-12-09 20:34:05 | Extensions, patch v16 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-09 19:56:15 | Re: initdb failure with Postgres 8.4.4 |