From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three |
Date: | 2010-12-01 13:53:12 |
Message-ID: | 4CF65348.7070903@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01.12.2010 15:39, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 01.12.2010 03:35, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>>> Let's recap what happens when a VM bit is set: You set the
>>>> PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag on the heap page (assuming it's not set already, it
>>>> usually isn't), and then set the bit in the VM while keeping the heap
>>>> page locked.
>>>
>>> What if we set PD_ALL_VISIBLE on the heap page, wait for a checkpoint to
>>> happen so the heap page is guaranteed to be on disk, then on next read,
>>> if PD_ALL_VISIBLE is set and the VM all-visible bit is not set, set the
>>> VM bit.
>>
>> Hmm, you'd somehow have to know if a checkpoint has happened since the
>> flag was set. And it might be a long wait, which makes it less
>
> Well, doesn't the page LSN tell you that already?
If we update the LSN when we set the flag, then we have to write the
full-page-image. That's very expensive. If we don't update the LSN, then
the LSN says nothing about when the flag was set.
>> attractive for index-only scans.
>
> My assumption is that this page will remain read-only for a while, so I
> don't see the big downside in a delay of max 5-10 minutes. For sites
> where pages go frequently in and out of read-only status, I don't think
> index-only scans are every going to be a big win. Long-running queries
> alone are going to delay how quickly we can set PD_ALL_VISIBLE, so I
> don't see an additional 5-10 minutes as a big problem.
Perhaps we could live with it, but it would be annoying to have to
checkpoint after a data load, before index-only scans kick in.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Radosław Smogura | 2010-12-01 13:59:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-01 13:50:36 | Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4 |