Re: ON CONFLICT issues around whole row vars,

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT issues around whole row vars,
Date: 2015-09-29 19:35:19
Message-ID: 4CF60E10-4269-429D-921D-F2239E0E2388@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On September 29, 2015 8:52:14 PM GMT+02:00, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
>wrote:
>> So, took a bit longer than "tomorrow. I fought for a long while with
>a
>> mysterious issue, which turned out to be separate bug: The excluded
>> relation was affected by row level security policies, which doesn't
>make
>> sense.
>
>Why? You certainly thought that it made sense for conventional column
>permissions due to potential problems with before row insert triggers.
>Why would RLS be different?

What would it mean? And why would it make sense to apply rls to a values list?

nodeModify already has the necessary rls invocations, no?

Andres

---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-09-29 19:47:47 Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-09-29 19:23:30 Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness