From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ON CONFLICT issues around whole row vars, |
Date: | 2015-09-29 19:35:19 |
Message-ID: | 4CF60E10-4269-429D-921D-F2239E0E2388@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On September 29, 2015 8:52:14 PM GMT+02:00, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
>wrote:
>> So, took a bit longer than "tomorrow. I fought for a long while with
>a
>> mysterious issue, which turned out to be separate bug: The excluded
>> relation was affected by row level security policies, which doesn't
>make
>> sense.
>
>Why? You certainly thought that it made sense for conventional column
>permissions due to potential problems with before row insert triggers.
>Why would RLS be different?
What would it mean? And why would it make sense to apply rls to a values list?
nodeModify already has the necessary rls invocations, no?
Andres
---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-29 19:47:47 | Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-09-29 19:23:30 | Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness |