Re: Performance under contention

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org>,<pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance under contention
Date: 2010-11-22 01:47:09
Message-ID: 4CE9773D0200002500037CA6@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Ivan Voras wrote:

> After 16 clients (which is still good since there are only 12
> "real" cores in the system), the performance drops sharply

Yet another data point to confirm the importance of connection
pooling. :-)

-Kevin

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Voras 2010-11-22 02:18:50 Re: Performance under contention
Previous Message Ivan Voras 2010-11-22 00:15:43 Performance under contention