| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: add label to enum syntax |
| Date: | 2010-11-14 15:42:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4CE0036F.6060706@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/29/2010 01:47 AM, Pavel Golub wrote:
> Hello, Alvaro.
>
> You wrote:
>
> AH> Excerpts from Pavel Golub's message of jue oct 28 07:50:24 -0300 2010:
>
>>> Forgot link to poll:
>>> http://pgolub.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/poll-alter-type-enumtype-add-what-newlabel/
> AH> Hah, there are 17 votes as of right now, no option is below 23% and no
> AH> option is above 29%.
>
>
> Yeah, right now 42 votes:
>
> VALUE 26%
> LABEL 26%
> Just ADD 'newlabel' 24%
> ELEMENT 21%
> MEMBER 2%
>
It's fairly unscientific and inconclusive, and the discussion seems to
have died. I think since Tom and I did most of the work on this our
voices should count a little louder :-) , so I'm going to go with his
suggestion of VALUE, unless there are loud squawks.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-14 15:44:23 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
| Previous Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2010-11-14 15:28:16 | Re: wCTE behaviour |