From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, david(at)kineticode(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: multi-platform, multi-locale regression tests |
Date: | 2010-11-10 22:15:16 |
Message-ID: | 4CDB1974.5030407@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/10/2010 05:06 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Marti Raudsepp<marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Sounds like you could use pgTAP with dblink to do the same? :)
>
> I had never read through the docs for dblink until you posted this.
> In fact, it appears that some testing of proper SSI behavior can be
> added to standard regression tests with dblink (without needing
> pgTAP) if there is some way to allow a contrib module like that to
> be used. Would I have to add the SSI tests to the dblink regression
> tests, or is there some more graceful way that might be made to
> work?
>
> I don't think this would be a sane way to *replace* the dcheck
> tests, but it might be a way to work *some* testing of SSI into a
> more frequently run test set.
We already use some contrib stuff in the regression tests. (It really is
time we stopped calling it contrib.)
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-10 22:26:17 | Re: B-tree parent pointer and checkpoints |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-11-10 22:06:10 | Re: multi-platform, multi-locale regression tests |