Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL
Date: 2010-11-09 15:12:03
Message-ID: 4CD964C3.70208@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/09/2010 09:59 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> And this makes me think that SQLite is indeed the right tool for the job
> here, and not PostgreSQL. If someone intrudes, it's going to be in the
> same process running the web browser, not in some server running under
> another user identity in the machine. That seems like a feature to me,
> not a bug.
>

Right. Then it has some chance to be run in a sandbox. This doesn't
strike me at all as a good fit for Postgres.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-09 15:14:09 Re: CLUSTER can change t_len
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-11-09 14:59:59 Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL