Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Charles Pritchard <chuck(at)jumis(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL
Date: 2010-11-08 21:17:50
Message-ID: 4CD868FE.40602@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/08/2010 04:06 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
>
>> Because of a lack of "interested implementers", the spec does not put forward a standard dialect/subset. It simply uses Sqlite
> As de-facto standards go, you could do *much* worse.

I have no idea what's in the standard, but SQLite should be fairly
PostgreSQL compatible. Its author has told me he used PostgreSQL as a
template when implementing his SQL dialect.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2010-11-08 21:21:17 Re: proposal: plpgsql - iteration over fields of rec or row variable
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2010-11-08 21:06:46 Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL