| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6? |
| Date: | 2010-11-05 20:15:20 |
| Message-ID: | 4CD465D8.4070007@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
All,
Domas (of Facebook/Wikipedia, MySQL geek) pointed me to this report:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_perf_regressions&num=1
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_then_now&num=6
The serious problems with this appear to be (a) that Linux/Ext4 PG
performance still hasn't fully recovered, and, (b) that RHEL6 is set to
ship with kernel 2.6.32, which means that we'll have a whole generation
of RHEL which is off-limits to PostgreSQL.
Tom, any word from your coworkers on this?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-11-05 20:15:38 | Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump |
| Previous Message | Samuel Gendler | 2010-11-05 19:29:48 | Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question? |