Re: max_wal_senders must die

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date: 2010-11-03 20:01:49
Message-ID: 4CD1795D020000250003721F@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> I guess you built both in the same place and just prefix installed
> it to different directories?

We always build in a directory tree with a name based on the
version, with a prefix based on the version. This is routine for
us. I have a hard time believing that they made an error on that,
but I'll try to re-create in a controlled way so that I can report
specific error messages and confirm my assumptions.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Davies 2010-11-03 20:32:18 SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-11-03 19:57:59 Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger