JDBC Transactions

From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt(at)abpni(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: JDBC Transactions
Date: 2010-11-01 17:37:54
Message-ID: 4CCEFAF2.7080500@abpni.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Everyone,

I'm trying to create a server for a database system which will be used
by multiple clients. Of course, table locking is very important. Reading
the Postgresql docs, locking occurs on a transaction-by-transaction basis.

In our java code, we are doing this:

//Start Code Block

Connection con = "..."
con.setAutoComitt(false);

//Insert SQL here to lock table

String qry1 = "..."
pst1 = con.prepareStatement(qry1)
//Insert code here to add values to prepared statement pst1
pst1.executequery();

String qry2 = "..."
pst2 = con.prepareStatement(qry2)
//Insert code here to add values to prepared statement pst2
pst2.executequery();

con.comitt();

//End Code Block

My question is, would the above block of code be classed as a single
transaction, and would the locking work correctly?

Thanks

Jonny

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan Tripathy 2010-11-01 17:42:28 Connection Pool
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2010-11-01 17:32:23 Re: 8.4 Data Not Compatible with 9.0.1 Upgrade?