From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,"Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Steve Crawford" <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ben Chobot" <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles |
Date: | 2010-10-21 17:15:15 |
Message-ID: | 4CC02ED30200002500036C24@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance pgsql-www |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> full_page_writes is designed to guard against a partial write to a
> device. I don't think the raid cache can be partially written to
So you're confident that an 8kB write to the controller will not be
done as a series of smaller atomic writes by the OS file system?
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-10-21 17:31:09 | Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-10-21 17:04:17 | Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-10-21 17:31:09 | Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-10-21 17:04:17 | Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles |