Re: Git migration deadline for Buildfarm

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PGBuildFarm <pgbuildfarm-members(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git migration deadline for Buildfarm
Date: 2010-10-15 21:03:14
Message-ID: 4CB8C192.7010902@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers

On 09/27/2010 08:13 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> In about a week I propose to have the buildfarm server start to reject
> results based on snapshots where the newest file is older than the
> time of the git migration a week ago. That means buildfarm owners need
> to upgrade to using git. Many have already: see
> <http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl>
>
>
[snip]
>
> If you think you deserve a dispensation, please ask me, but I really
> don't want the buildfarm server polluted with new builds of frozen
> code. That doesn't help anyone - it's just useless noise.
>
>

I have now implemented a policy of refusing results from snapshots older
than 10 days. It's not quite what I said above, but I think it's sound
policy. Also, I think we've waited long enough, and a few owners aren't
responding to multiple prods.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse buildfarm-members by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-15 21:32:13 Re: Git migration deadline for Buildfarm
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-10-12 21:07:12 Re: Git cvsserver serious issue

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-15 21:13:55 Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2010-10-15 20:58:15 Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.