From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | PGBuildFarm <pgbuildfarm-members(at)pgfoundry(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Git migration deadline for Buildfarm |
Date: | 2010-10-15 21:03:14 |
Message-ID: | 4CB8C192.7010902@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers |
On 09/27/2010 08:13 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> In about a week I propose to have the buildfarm server start to reject
> results based on snapshots where the newest file is older than the
> time of the git migration a week ago. That means buildfarm owners need
> to upgrade to using git. Many have already: see
> <http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl>
>
>
[snip]
>
> If you think you deserve a dispensation, please ask me, but I really
> don't want the buildfarm server polluted with new builds of frozen
> code. That doesn't help anyone - it's just useless noise.
>
>
I have now implemented a policy of refusing results from snapshots older
than 10 days. It's not quite what I said above, but I think it's sound
policy. Also, I think we've waited long enough, and a few owners aren't
responding to multiple prods.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-15 21:32:13 | Re: Git migration deadline for Buildfarm |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-10-12 21:07:12 | Re: Git cvsserver serious issue |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-15 21:13:55 | Re: string function - "format" function proposal |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-10-15 20:58:15 | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |