Re: WIP: extensible enums

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums
Date: 2010-10-15 14:02:40
Message-ID: 4CB85F00.9020009@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/15/2010 04:33 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> I started looking at this last night, but ran out of time. I'll
> continue this evening / over the weekend. Here are my comments so far:
>
> Patch applies cleanly to current git master with no offsets.
> Compiles cleanly with no warnings.
> Regression tests pass.
>
> The regression tests look reasonable, but I'd like to see a test of
> \dT+. Also it could be made to exercise the comparison function more
> if the test query did an ORDER BY CAST(enumlabel as planets).
>
> The docs for ALTER TYPE have been updated. I found a few minor typos,
> and also a couple of other sections of the manual that needed
> updating.
>
> Attached is an updated version with these changes. Andrew, let me know
> if you're happy with these tweaks and I'll continue reviewing over the
> weekend.

Thanks for the review. This looks good.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomáš Pospíšil 2010-10-15 14:08:45 Re: [HACKERS] XML schema validation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-15 13:52:59 Re: [GENERAL] pg_filedump binary for CentOS