| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <david(at)fetter(dot)org>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |
| Date: | 2010-10-14 12:55:22 |
| Message-ID: | 4CB6B76A02000025000369B1@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Robert Haas wrote:
> Is this a JDBC patch or a PG patch? Are we tracking JDBC patches
> using the CF app?
If this were the only patch for setQueryTimeout in front of us I
probably wouldn't have suggested that, but this thread started with a
patch proposal to implement the same JDBC feature through adding new
backend functions. Unless that patch is withdrawn or rejected, it
seems odd for two different groups to be simultaneously considering
patches to implement exactly the same functionality....
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2010-10-14 13:46:16 | Re: Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-10-14 12:50:35 | Re: string function - "format" function proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2010-10-14 13:15:30 | XA Xid to PostgreSQL transaction ID |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-14 12:22:21 | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |