From: | Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gary Chambers <gwchamb(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Duplicates Processing |
Date: | 2010-10-12 15:14:34 |
Message-ID: | 4CB47B5A.2070001@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Gross generalization perhaps, but keep in mind what the over app/system
needs of the components. Bounce those off you standard ER modeling
instincts and vice versa and you have a chance!
On 10/12/2010 08:19 AM, Gary Chambers wrote:
> Rob,
>
> Thanks for your reply!
>
>> And to your point of self-reference, it would be to a co-worker more
>> than a manager. Managers are often not good replacements for workers. :)
>
> :) Absolutely!
>
> I was having a conversation over on #postgresql yesterday about this
> and, due to my inexperience with managing electronic components (and
> some of the database issues involved), I still have a few unanswered
> questions. I would like to create a master table of parts derived
> from the individual tables (e.g. resistors, capacitors, diodes, etc.).
> I have the rare opportunity to build this from the ground, up and
> would like to ensure that I get it right. Thanks for any advice that
> you (or anyone) can offer.
>
> -- Gary Chambers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Cloos | 2010-10-15 09:57:23 | Re: counting related rows |
Previous Message | Gary Chambers | 2010-10-12 14:19:24 | Re: Duplicates Processing |