Re: Slow count(*) again...

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org >> \"pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org\"" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2010-10-12 06:32:09
Message-ID: 4CB400E9.401@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Mladen Gogala wrote:
> I agree, but I am afraid that after the demise of SGI, XFS isn't being
> developed.

It's back to being well maintained again; see
http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/en/2010/04/the-return-of-xfs-on-linux.html
for some history here and why it's become relevant to RedHat in
particular recently.

--
Greg Smith, 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
Author, "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance" Pre-ordering at:
https://www.packtpub.com/postgresql-9-0-high-performance/book

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-10-12 06:39:32 Re: Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Shigeru HANADA 2010-10-12 06:27:55 Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-10-12 06:39:32 Re: Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message david 2010-10-12 04:35:25 Re: Slow count(*) again...