Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
Date: 2010-10-08 16:29:59
Message-ID: 4CAF4707.3040405@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/07/2010 06:38 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Yes, let's please just implement something simple and get it
> committed. k = 1. Two GUCs (synchronous_standbys = name, name, name
> and synchronous_waitfor = none|recv|fsync|apply), SUSET so you can
> change it per txn. Done. We can revise it *the day after it's
> committed* if we agree on how. And if we*don't* agree, then we can
> ship it and we still win.

If we have all this code, and it appears that we do, +1 to commit it now
so that we can start testing.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-10-08 16:36:10 Re: Timeout and Synch Rep
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-10-08 16:27:46 Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes