From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
Date: | 2010-10-08 15:06:26 |
Message-ID: | 4CAF3372.8040508@bluegap.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/08/2010 04:47 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Yes, I really want to avoid such issues and likely complexities we get
> into trying to solve them. In reality they should not be common because
> it only happens if the sysadmin has not configured sufficient number of
> redundant standbys.
Well, full cluster outages are infrequent, but sadly cannot be avoided
entirely. (Murphy's laughing). IMO we should be prepared to deal with
those. Or am I understanding you wrongly here?
> I don't
> think we should be spending too much time trying to help people that say
> they want additional durability guarantees but do not match that with
> sufficient hardware resources to make it happen smoothly.
I fully agree to that statement.
Regards
Markus Wanner
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-10-08 15:10:11 | Re: Sync Replication with transaction-controlled durability |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-10-08 15:03:02 | Re: Git cvsserver serious issue |