| From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
| Date: | 2010-10-08 09:07:36 |
| Message-ID: | 4CAEDF58.3020800@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/08/2010 11:00 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> From the perspective of an observer, randomly selecting a standby for
> load balancing purposes: No, they are not guaranteed to see the "latest"
> answer, nor even can they find out whether what they are seeing is the
> latest answer.
I completely agree. The application (or at least the load balancer)
needs to be aware of that fact.
Regards
Markus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marios Vodas | 2010-10-08 09:27:05 | compiling C library under mingw |
| Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2010-10-08 09:02:49 | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |