| From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
| Date: | 2010-10-08 07:46:46 |
| Message-ID: | 4CAECC66.3080509@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/08/2010 12:30 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I do, but its not a parameter. The k = 1 behaviour is hardcoded and
> considerably simplifies the design. Moving to k > 1 is additional work,
> slows things down and seems likely to be fragile.
Perfect! So I'm all in favor of committing that, but leaving away the
timeout thing, which I think is just adding unneeded complexity and
fragility.
Regards
Markus Wanner
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Wanner | 2010-10-08 07:52:33 | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-10-08 07:26:45 | Re: proposal: plpgsql, solution for derivated types of parameters |