| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) |
| Date: | 2010-10-08 05:48:18 |
| Message-ID: | 4CAEB0A2.8090704@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07.10.2010 21:33, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 1) This version of Standby Registration seems to add One More Damn Place
> You Need To Configure Standby (OMDPYNTCS) without adding any
> functionality you couldn't get *without* having a list on the master.
> Can someone explain to me what functionality is added by this approach
> vs. not having a list on the master at all?
It's just one GUC. Without the list, there would have to be at least a
boolean option to enable/disable it.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-10-08 05:52:09 | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
| Previous Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-10-08 05:47:57 | Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch |