XFS vs Ext3, and schedulers, for WAL

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: XFS vs Ext3, and schedulers, for WAL
Date: 2010-10-06 23:11:16
Message-ID: 4CAD0214.50304@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

All,

There's a number of blog tests floating around comparing XFS and Ext3,
and the various Linux schedulers, for PGDATA or for an all-in-one mount.

However, the WAL has a rather particular write pattern, and it's
reasonable to assume that it shouldn't be optimized the same way as
PGDATA. Has anyone done any head-to-heads for WAL drive configuration
changes?

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-07 00:39:48 Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Previous Message Jon Nelson 2010-10-06 22:34:20 Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance