From: | Michele Petrazzo - Unipex <michele(dot)petrazzo(at)unipex(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)it> |
Subject: | Re: [9.0] hot standby plus streaming replication |
Date: | 2010-10-01 07:02:03 |
Message-ID: | 4CA5876B.60209@unipex.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Gabriele Bartolini ha scritto:
> Ciao Michele,
Ciao ;)
>
>> both server (master and standby) need a common directory where
>> read
>>
> and write the wal files?
>
> Not necessarily. You can use for instance scp to ship the WAL file
> from the master to the standby using the network.
>
Thanks for the explain, but...
- why in my tests, _whitout_ common direcotory, master and slave keep in
sync also if I shutdown slave, add (in my last tests) something about
100k record (although little ones) on the master and then after woke up
the slave in about 2/3 seconds I have all the dbs in sync? It's just
luck or there are something that I don't understand?
- If I have to copy (scp / rsync / etc...) the files, which interval I
have to follow? And also, when the slave will read these files? There
are something like inotify or I have to say to slave "my friend, there
are updates from master. Keep in sync!"
>> Just another question about replication: there is the possibility
>> to
> build a sync between a 32 and a 64 bit (on linux)?
>
> As stated in the documentation
> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/warm-standby.html) the
> hardware architecture must be the same.
>
If I read before this page, I spared a lot of tries!
> Hope this helps.
>
> Ciao, Gabriele
>
Thanks a lot,
Michele
P.s. Glad to see that also in Italy there are PostgreSQL guru ;)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jayadevan M | 2010-10-01 07:07:15 | Re: [9.0] hot standby plus streaming replication |
Previous Message | GOO Creations | 2010-10-01 06:58:03 | Re: libpq (C++) - Insert binary data |