From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Git cvsserver serious issue |
Date: | 2010-09-22 14:33:39 |
Message-ID: | 4C9A13C3.6040305@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers |
On 09/22/2010 10:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> If we're going to let people in by IP address, maybe we could let legacy
> buildfarm members in by IP address. It doesn't seem particularly
> helpful to expect each buildfarm owner to solve this problem for
> themselves. I'd also note that if they could run git locally, they
> wouldn't be needing cvsserver in the first place.
>
> Also, couldn't we just set up the cvsserver on its own VM with a limited
> amount of disk space, and not worry too much about any "DOS threat"?
> If somebody does do this, block them and reinitialize that server.
I'm not convinced we need any such thing yet. 13 of the 38 animals that
have reported in the last 5 days are using git already (OK, factoring
out my animals that's 8 out of 33). I'm going to send out email in a few
days prodding people to migrate. Let's see how far we get.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-22 15:07:40 | Re: Git cvsserver serious issue |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-22 14:26:59 | Re: Git cvsserver serious issue |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-22 14:33:49 | Re: Needs Suggestion |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-22 14:30:45 | Re: knngist patch preliminary review (2010-09 commitfest) |