Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Colin 't Hart <colinthart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal?
Date: 2010-09-20 14:54:34
Message-ID: 4C9775AA.4010000@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/20/2010 10:29 AM, Colin 't Hart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Back in 2002 these were proposed, what happened to them?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2002-09/msg00406.php

2002 is a looooooooong time ago.

>
>
> Also I note:
>
> colin(at)ruby:~/workspace/eyedb$ psql
> psql (8.4.4)
> Type "help" for help.
>
> colin=> select to_date('731332', 'YYMMDD');
> to_date
> ------------
> 1974-02-01
> (1 row)
>
> colin=>
>
>
> The fact that this wraps would seem to me to make the implementation
> of is_date() difficult.
>
>
>

I think to_date is the wrong gadget to use here. You should probably be
using the date input routine and trapping any data exception. e.g.:

test_date := date_in(textout(some_text));

In plpgsql you'd put that inside a begin/exception/end block that traps
SQLSTATE '22000' which is the class covering data exceptions.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-09-20 14:55:51 Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication
Previous Message Colin 't Hart 2010-09-20 14:29:52 What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal?