Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?

From: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
To: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Swaminathan Saikumar <swami(at)giveexam(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?
Date: 2008-01-31 01:06:09
Message-ID: 4C965F08-ADB3-4C20-85D1-F78497FE06C9@myemma.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Jan 30, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:

> If you don't get too much feed back on this subject, just remember
> that topics like this come up frequently to the point of list
> member exhaustion. You can find such discussions if you search
> the list archive.

Too true. There's only so many times people can be confronted with
"Defend yourselves!" before they start ignoring it. On the flip
side, when you approach with "Tell me, what advantages does Postgres
have to offer?" you'll find many people all too willing to step up
with pride.

Erik Jones

DBA | Emma®
erik(at)myemma(dot)com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Swaminathan Saikumar 2008-01-31 01:12:27 Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?
Previous Message Dan Langille 2008-01-31 01:03:14 Re: PostgreSQL Certification