Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...

From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Date: 2010-09-08 17:08:24
Message-ID: 4C87C308.4070403@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane írta:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
>
>> I'm not really happy with the naming, comments, or some of the code
>> flow, but I think the concept looks reasonable.
>>
>
> There seems to be a lot of unnecessary palloc/pfree traffic in this
> implementation. Getting rid of that might help the speed.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

This was a first WIP implementation, I will look into it, thanks.

--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-08 17:19:38 Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-09-08 17:05:59 Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...