| From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs |
| Date: | 2010-08-14 12:12:50 |
| Message-ID: | 4C668842.9040409@cs.helsinki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2010-08-08 1:45 PM +0300, I wrote:
> On 8/8/2010 12:49 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> For those migrating code from Oracle, providing this feature as-is
>> might be valuable, since presumably they are not too concerned about
>> these concurrency issues. Ideally we'd want to do better though.
>
> Yes, you might be right. This feature on its on can greatly simplify
> what people now have to do to get triggers on views.
This weekend I had the luxury of working with our VIEW system, and it
seems like I greatly underestimated the power of this feature, even if
the concurrency issues I've mentioned in this thread would be left
unaddressed.
I haven't looked at the patch yet (I plan to do so), but +100 for this
feature.
Should we expect a new patch any time soon?
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-08-14 13:02:22 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2010-08-14 09:47:54 | Re: WIP partial replication patch |